Third Circuit limits New Jersey enforcement over Kalshi contracts
The ruling affects whether New Jersey can apply its gambling rules to Kalshi’s sports-linked contracts.
The ruling affects whether New Jersey can apply its gambling rules to Kalshi’s sports-linked contracts.
The ruling prevents New Jersey from blocking Kalshi’s sports-related event contracts, though the state may seek rehearing.
The appellate ruling could shape state enforcement of Kalshi’s sports contracts and related litigation elsewhere.
Operators offering event contracts in Canada may face registration requirements and enforcement if they do not comply with securities or derivatives laws.
The appeal could affect how prediction-market event contracts are treated under Nevada law.
The cases could determine whether state gambling frameworks apply to sports-related event contracts offered in those markets.
The ruling limits New Jersey’s ability to enforce state gambling rules against Kalshi’s event contracts.
Kalshi must maintain restrictions in Nevada without a gaming licence and implement geofencing controls under the judge’s order.
The order requires Kalshi to restrict access in Nevada and could affect operators offering event contracts there.
The Nevada order restricts Kalshi’s event contracts in the state while its dispute with regulators proceeds.
The lawsuits could affect how prediction-market operators face state gambling rules while the federal jurisdiction dispute proceeds.
The opposing proposals leave Russia’s potential online casino legalisation and taxation uncertain for operators and policymakers.
The cases could affect whether prediction platforms face tribal and state gambling restrictions on sports event contracts.
The CFTC’s approach could determine which sports-related event contracts prediction-market operators may list.
The agreements establish sports-league partnerships and event-contract limits for Polymarket.
The case could determine whether Kalshi can offer sports-related prediction contracts in Nevada under state gambling laws.
The lawsuit tests whether federal commodities law prevents Washington from applying gambling laws to event contracts.
The figures show licensed operators experienced declines across both online and land-based channels in 2024.
The case could determine whether Illinois may require prediction-market exchanges to comply with state rules or licensing.
Prediction-market exchanges face stated expectations to monitor trading and guard against insider dealing and manipulation.
Court outcomes could determine whether prediction-market operators must restrict products or meet state gambling rules.
The warning sets out compliance and enforcement risks for firms offering event contracts in Canada.
Operators will need to block centrally self-excluded players while maintaining their existing site-level programmes.
Source: AGCO (Ontario)
Tender
The RFP starts Aichi’s process to develop a proposal for a potential Japanese integrated resort licence.
Operators must register, contract with Alberta iGaming Corporation and connect to the central self-exclusion system before launch.