Oklahoma tribe disputes Kalshi’s partnership claim
The denial challenges Kalshi’s account of a tribal partnership.
Prediction markets & exchanges
Business and regulatory developments involving Kalshi. Open in the feed
Add it to your personal digest. Manage your digest
Licensing, commercial relationships and regulatory developments.
Reported licences, deals, appointments and other connections. Follow the entry links for context.
Newest first, grouped by month.
The denial challenges Kalshi’s account of a tribal partnership.
The analysis questions Kalshi’s explanation for concentrated activity in its ether perpetual contracts.
The access restrictions affect how prediction-market platforms can serve users in Taiwan amid enforcement over election-related betting.
The dispute concerns whether states can apply gambling rules to sports-event contracts offered by federally regulated exchanges.
The new contracts allow partial settlement rather than requiring players to reach the full statistical target.
The dispute could affect whether prediction market operators face state gambling laws alongside federal oversight.
The findings bear on state challenges to Kalshi and Polymarket's position that their contracts fall exclusively under CFTC jurisdiction.
The comments raise licensing and tribal-law questions for prediction-market operators and tribes considering agreements with them.
The outcome could determine whether prediction market operators can continue serving the US market under federal or state rules.
Nevada has no fallback plan if the Supreme Court sides with prediction market operators, leaving its stance uncertain.
The suit contests state authority over Underdog’s prediction market and follows a ruling against Kalshi.
Investors assessing election betting growth must consider that Polymarket’s busiest 1% of wallets generated 70% of congressional trading volume.
Kalshi’s proposed rule would allow financial penalties, suspension or account deactivation for users harassing athletes or third parties over trading.
BetMGM's iGaming revenue exceeded its online sports betting revenue, giving investors a comparison of the operator's two businesses.
Kalshi retains preliminary protection from Illinois gambling enforcement, while wager-related fees remain subject to further briefing.
Kalshi’s investigation subjects trades preceding a public appointment to scrutiny over possible advance knowledge.
Ohio’s request puts disputed state and federal authority over sports prediction market operators before the Supreme Court.
Sports trading helped prediction market operators exceed their previous monthly volume record.
Kalshi’s sports contract share and DraftKings’ app download share give investors measures of prediction market competition.
Coinbase must suspend Michigan prediction markets while Michigan withholds enforcement during compliance and related appeals.
The reported public view and opposition to several types of betting inform the debate over prediction market oversight.
The lobbying seeks to influence the regulatory treatment of prediction market products in the USA.
The poll gives investors divided expectations for DraftKings and Flutter, including adaptation, displacement and consolidation with prediction markets.
The measures could affect how operators and prediction-market exchanges are regulated at federal and state level.
The partnerships create commercial opportunities for tribal operators while legal disputes over sports event contracts remain unresolved.
Operators could face separate state disputes over sports event contracts if Supreme Court review leaves conflicting appeals decisions unresolved.
The case could determine whether prediction markets must meet state gambling requirements when competing with licensed sportsbooks.
ARK Invest’s purchase backs Kalshi’s US prediction market business through three actively managed ETFs.
The proposal would restrict election contract trading by federal candidates, specified family members and campaign committees, backed by civil penalties.
The dispute concerns whether federal commodities regulators or gambling authorities should oversee sports contracts, affecting prediction market oversight.
The partnerships give the tribes customer-facing apps while Kalshi operates the underlying exchange and settles transactions.
The case and lawsuit could affect how sports event contracts operate and how Florida’s gaming compact applies to DraftKings’ platform.
Kalshi’s tribal partnerships and FanDuel’s continuing shift away from CME mark changes in their business relationships.
Conflicting state rulings underpin calls for Supreme Court intervention in New Jersey’s prediction-market appeal involving Kalshi.
The NFL seeks gambling classification for prediction-market apps, citing sporting integrity concerns, unclear rules and limited sports wagering oversight.
The possible blocks would restrict access to the targeted websites for users in Norway.
The case could affect whether states can regulate sports prediction markets and the safeguards operators face.
Prediction market regulation faces scrutiny through 39 states’ Supreme Court filing and the NFL’s call for clarity.
Four additional tribal agreements give tribes app ownership and customer management while Kalshi supplies exchange services.
The dispute concerns whether sports prediction platforms must comply with state gambling laws alongside federal financial supervision.
Nevada’s proposed regulatory amendment would remove references to the National Council on Problem Gambling.
The NFL’s Supreme Court brief supports treating sports event contracts as gambling subject to state gambling laws.
Coinbase’s withdrawal follows Michigan enforcement against sports event contracts that regulators consider unauthorised sports betting.
Four tribes’ planned Kalshi apps could extend prediction markets to smaller, remote communities, according to Kalshi.
The case could determine whether states can apply gambling laws to prediction market operators such as Kalshi and Polymarket.
Accepting New Jersey’s appeal would enable Supreme Court review of prediction market oversight without resolving the merits.
Operators offering these products in Utah face an explicit legal warning, while Kalshi contests the state's authority through its federal appeal.
IAGR and NAGRA’s joint brief adds regulatory backing to New Jersey’s request for Supreme Court review.
Reported wash trading estimates and sports betting concentration put prediction platforms’ trading integrity and younger users under scrutiny.
Investors can compare HIP-4’s early October daily volume of roughly $1.25m with higher volumes at Kalshi and Polymarket.
Federal candidates would face financial penalties for trading prediction market contracts on their own elections under the proposed legislation.
Utah’s effort to apply gambling prohibitions puts prediction market operators in conflict with the administration’s position on their classification.
Kalshi’s injunction prevents Illinois from imposing prediction market rules while questions over proposed wagering fees and taxes remain.
The injunctions give Kalshi and the CFTC interim judicial relief against Illinois.
The Illinois finding supports Kalshi’s sports contracts qualifying as swaps as Ohio regulators pursue separate enforcement against prediction markets.
Prediction market operators could face the gambling tax treatment applied to conventional sportsbooks if authorities adopt the analysis’s interpretation.
Ohio will enforce gambling laws against Kalshi after the court rejected its federal commodities law defence.
JPMorgan’s estimate gives investors potential additional EBITDA from Genius Sports’ agreements with Kalshi and Polymarket.
Sports and combo markets generated 86% of Sunday volume, highlighting their importance to prediction market operators.
Polymarket and Kalshi face unresolved oversight questions as experts warn stock-linked contracts could affect share trading and complicate enforcement.
Heather Maurer’s departure changes NCPG leadership following the organisation’s announcement of a $2m partnership with Kalshi.
The dispute pits state gambling enforcement against the CFTC’s claim of exclusive jurisdiction over sports-event contracts.
Tribal leaders and the AGA are coordinating against prediction markets as a California coalition prepares for possible sports betting changes.
Operators face differing competitive positions: Polymarket leads branded searches, while Kalshi leads trading volume and narrows the search gap.
Kalshi faces application of Ohio and Tennessee sports betting laws following the Sixth Circuit's ruling against it.
NCPG must replace its executive director while managing member departures linked to its Kalshi partnership.
The decision supports Ohio and Tennessee’s efforts to apply state oversight to sports prediction market apps.
Tennessee’s enforcement injunction was removed, while Ohio’s denial of similar protection leaves Kalshi subject to state gambling laws.
Kalshi restricted prediction market access on three California tribal reservations after an appeals court found likely tribal gaming law breaches.
The dispute brings Polymarket into New York’s legal battle over prediction markets.
Conflicting appeals court positions leave prediction market operators facing disagreement over whether sports event contracts constitute bets.
Investors face contrasting casino transaction outcomes as an MGM takeover collapsed while the Caesars deal progressed.
Kalshi faces continued legal challenges after an appeals court backed tribes’ preliminary injunction and found their claims likely to succeed.
Kalshi and Polymarket face a requested Senate examination of whether presidential family connections enabled financial gain or privileged access.
The federation seeks court orders that would restrict how Kalshi identifies Liga MX event contracts.
Prediction market exchanges face a CFTC warning about manipulation risks involving public figures’ statements or actions.
The disparity between Ethereum turnover and open interest raises questions for investors assessing Kalshi’s reported trading activity.
The launch gives a Tribal-owned business access to Kalshi’s exchange while other Tribal governments challenge sports-event contracts in court.
Texas legislators heard calls for litigation against prediction markets alongside Kalshi’s warnings about offshore alternatives.
Prediction market operators face demands to comply with Missouri gambling rules and pay gambling taxes, with litigation possible if they refuse.
The Kalshi partnership prompted Ohio’s regulator to end its NCPG relationship and drew opposition from Michigan and Nevada regulators.
Kalshi and Robinhood face a Ninth Circuit ruling backing key aspects of two California tribes’ challenge.
Stork’s Kalshi agreement supplies institutional trading firms with live and historical prediction-market data for research, market making and arbitrage.
CNBC linked growing interest in Polymarket and Kalshi to football’s return and the approaching November election.
The Indian Gaming Association seeks explicit safeguards against federal commodities law overriding state and tribal gaming laws.
Sportsbooks compete with prediction markets for customers and advertising placements, according to Intelitics chief executive Allan Stone.
The ruling subjects disputed Nevada sports event contracts to gambling rules, while DraftKings and Flutter shares gained.
Operators face unresolved gaming definitions as the CFTC deliberates and Nevada and New Jersey assert authority over sports-outcome contracts.
Polymarket and Kalshi’s European expansion accompanies ESMA calls for monitoring insider trading, manipulation and potential retail harm.
ESMA warns European operators face a different regulatory environment from the United States for prediction markets.
Coinbase’s selected platform automates contract creation, resolution, settlement and reporting for Kalshi prediction-market products.
The Massachusetts Gaming Commission maintains its NCPG relationship despite concerns about Kalshi’s organisational membership.
Pennsylvania proposals would introduce prediction-market taxation, PGCB oversight, insider-trading bans and restrictions on bets involving deaths and youth sport.
The Senate hearing gives Texas lawmakers an opportunity to examine prediction market oversight and youth access.
DICE gives investors ETF exposure to prediction market businesses, including private holdings in Kalshi and Polymarket.
The ruling leaves Kalshi exposed to Utah gambling enforcement while its appeal continues.
MGC retains its National Council on Problem Gambling membership while leaving commissioners scope to revisit it at renewal.
Kalshi’s injunction rejection rests on the judge finding express federal pre-emption of Iowa law unlikely for sports event contracts.
ESMA’s report highlights blurred boundaries between financial instruments, prediction markets and gambling, explicitly naming Polymarket and Kalshi.
The ruling leaves Iowa able to apply gambling laws to Kalshi as regulators allege unauthorised sporting outcome markets.
The bill seeks to remove Illinois’s prediction market tax, whose application Kalshi and the CFTC challenged in court.
The petition challenges a ruling favouring Kalshi over New Jersey’s authority to regulate its sports contracts as gambling.
State officials are examining gambling laws as grounds to regulate or prohibit operators’ election prediction contracts.
Kalshi failed to secure preliminary protection against Iowa gambling enforcement targeting its sports event contracts.
Prediction market platforms face proposed election trading safeguards while court disputes continue over states’ gambling regulatory authority.
Robinhood’s sports event contracts remain withdrawn from Michigan at least until the Sixth Circuit rules on related appeals.
Kalshi remains subject to Utah gambling law enforcement while appealing its District Court defeat.
Any UK legalisation could require prediction market operators to obtain gambling licences and comply with UKGC rules.
The partnership gives Kalshi exclusive official live streams and data rights for US prediction markets under a multi-year agreement.
Platforms would still need gambling licences for political outcome markets if the FCA relaxes its prediction market restriction.
The NFL is seeking removal of certain betting products from prediction platforms, including Kalshi and Polymarket.
Kalshi faces a Michigan sports contract ban and geoblocking order, alongside an adverse Ninth Circuit ruling.
The Illinois repeal proposal would remove the sports prediction market transaction tax challenged by Kalshi and the CFTC.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton remains outside states’ campaign against prediction markets despite his previous opposition to gambling.
DraftKings and FanDuel compete with Kalshi for US sports bettors as Kalshi avoids describing its product as a bet.
FanDuel and DraftKings face competition from Kalshi and Polymarket for sports betting customers as the NFL season approaches.
The case could determine whether operators offering sports event contracts must comply with state gambling licensing and tax requirements.
The preliminary injunction requires Kalshi to restrict Michigan users’ access to sports contracts.
Kalshi must exclude Michigan residents from online sports wagering or face financial penalties while the preliminary injunction remains effective.
The unanimous ruling subjects Kalshi’s sports markets to state sports betting laws, although Roth identified aspects potentially supporting Kalshi.
New York’s attorney general’s office challenges the CFTC’s emergency order as promoting Kalshi’s interests in nationwide litigation.
The petition seeks Supreme Court review of the dispute over state regulation of Kalshi’s sports contracts.
Kalshi must exclude Michigan customers and faces daily financial penalties if it fails to comply with the court's geolocation requirements.
Prediction market providers face scrutiny as Missouri’s attorney general seeks sportsbook taxation and regulation for sports prediction markets.
The preliminary injunction bars Kalshi from providing sports betting contracts to people in Michigan.
New Jersey seeks clarity on whether federal event contract oversight blocks state gambling enforcement.
Kalshi expects clarifying rules and league agreements that its chief executive believes could help navigate legal uncertainty.
Kalshi’s fine and three-year ban demonstrate enforcement of rules against candidates betting on their own elections.
Kalshi’s first permanent exclusion demonstrates its enforcement response to alleged manipulation of political prediction contracts.
Kalshi’s lifetime ban of Santos demonstrates participant exclusion as a disciplinary response to market manipulation.
Santos has lost access to Kalshi and his paid relationship with Polymarket.
Kalshi identified suspected trading misconduct, imposed a permanent exclusion and referred the matter to federal authorities.
Kalshi’s disciplinary cases address candidates buying contracts linked to themselves and alleged market manipulation.
The ruling classifies Kalshi’s sports contracts as bets rather than swaps protected under federal law.
Kalshi imposed a permanent ban and financial penalty over alleged manipulation involving Santos’s trading and public attendance statements.
Kalshi’s enforcement action addresses political candidates betting on their own electoral victory.
Kalshi’s exclusive partnership bars competing prediction market advertising at US Open venues and during television coverage.
The ruling backs Nevada’s action against Kalshi’s sports contracts after Kalshi failed to demonstrate likely federal pre-emption.
The ruling strengthens state regulators’ position in disputes over whether prediction platforms must comply with gambling rules.
The ruling permits Nevada to apply its gaming laws to Kalshi’s operations in the state.
Kalshi permanently barred Santos after concluding he likely profited from insider trading on wagers concerning his own attendance.
The CFTC sanction combines a fine, profit surrender and a three-year trading ban for betting on presidential speech content.
The Ninth Circuit upheld Nevada’s enforcement against Kalshi, rejecting federal financial regulation as protection from state gambling laws.
Conflicting appellate rulings on Kalshi could bring the dispute before the Supreme Court.
The court ruled against Kalshi’s Nevada sports contracts while leaving federal pre-emption unresolved for election contracts.
Prediction market operators face state gambling regulation under the appeals ruling, which Kalshi plans to challenge through further review.
Nevada can enforce gambling laws against Kalshi’s sports event contracts following rejection of its federal pre-emption argument.
Kalshi’s review found no evidence that Prakash traded on races covered by the fabricated election polls he circulated.
The ruling allows Nevada regulators to act against Kalshi’s prediction market operations despite its federal commodities law argument.
Users aged 18–21 traded approximately $3.9bn in sports contracts and parlays as leagues sought a minimum trading age of 21.
The guidance prevents platforms supervised by CSA and CIRO from offering sports and entertainment prediction contracts in Canada.
Kalshi faced further legal disputes in Connecticut and Montana as the sector added entrants, data partnerships and distribution agreements.
Kalshi’s injunction request was denied without prejudice, and the state must answer its complaint within 21 days.
The criticism puts the CFTC’s response to court orders under scrutiny from gaming attorneys.
Connecticut’s lawsuit seeks to halt Kalshi’s sports contracts and impose penalties and repayment of revenue generated in the state.
Connecticut seeks to stop Kalshi’s alleged unlicensed sports wagering, while Kalshi asserts exclusive CFTC jurisdiction and appeals an enforcement ruling.
Connecticut seeks an immediate injunction halting Kalshi’s sports-event contracts, alleging sports betting without state authorisation.
Kalshi faces a lawsuit seeking to stop its Connecticut sports contracts while contesting state gambling authority under federal oversight.
US casino operators are investing in dining, concerts and other attractions to draw Gen Z visitors.
The CFTC’s instruction leaves Kalshi facing conflicting agency and court directions over continued trading in New York.
Kalshi’s sponsorships expand MLB prediction market partnerships, with four new partners playing in states that prohibit sports betting.
The agreements give Kalshi advertising exposure and fan engagement opportunities across five MLB teams.
Potentially conflicting appeals rulings could bring the CFTC-state dispute over event contract oversight before the Supreme Court, according to Pidot.
Kalshi’s team partnerships and DraftKings’ Predictions advertising extend their California presence where sports betting remains illegal.
Kalshi’s partnerships with the Dodgers and four other MLB teams expand prediction market operators’ commercial relationships with clubs.
DraftKings joins Kalshi and Polymarket in California’s prediction market sector, where traditional sports betting remains illegal.
Kalshi is lobbying to maintain California platform access as DraftKings goes live in the state.
The dispute concerns states’ authority to oversee and tax prediction market operators’ activities.
The committee examined manipulation risks, while disputed examples highlight disagreement over which products breached standards.
Nevada challenges whether Kalshi’s support for state taxation alongside federal oversight strengthens its preemption case.
Nevada uses Kalshi’s acceptance of North Carolina’s revenue tax to argue that states have authority over prediction markets.
Nevada argues Kalshi’s acceptance of North Carolina’s trading revenue tax acknowledges state regulatory power and supports Nevada taxation.
The court-linked sports shutdown limits Kalshi’s market offering in Washington State.
Operators seeking relief from state enforcement face federal appeals proceedings as the CFTC moves towards new sector rules.
Operators face competing federal and state jurisdiction claims, alongside New York’s allegations against Kalshi over gambling and tax avoidance.
State regulators argue sports contracts require gambling licences, challenging platforms operating under CFTC oversight with substantial sports trading activity.
Kalshi’s bans and fines demonstrate enforcement against congressional candidates over alleged wagers involving their own candidacies.
Federal backing for permitted operators and insufficient congressional support underpin a lawyer’s assessment that states would gain no midterm advantage.
Novig’s reported $128m opening-week trading volume gives investors a launch benchmark against its claimed comparison with Kalshi.
The planned White House meeting connects prediction market executives with President Trump and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman.
Prediction market operators face calls for New York taxation alongside litigation over states’ allegations that they operate illegal sportsbooks.
Connecticut can enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi following the rejection of emergency relief pending appeal.
ParlayX’s planned prediction market platform centres on combination bets, following its original intention to concentrate on parlays.
Kalshi faces a requested daily fine over alleged failure to geofence certain event contracts in Nevada.
Operators face proposed Pennsylvania prediction market regulation that would require neither taxes nor licences while permitting sports event contracts.
Kalshi faces requested $120,000 daily fines over disputed compliance with a deadline to block specified bets in Nevada.
Kalshi faces potential daily fines as Nevada disputes compliance with the court-imposed geofencing deadline.
Kalshi must introduce customer controls by 19 August and GeoComply screening by 2 September under Washington’s amended injunction.
Kalshi remains without its requested emergency injunction during appeal after the judge rejected reliance on the CFTC order.
The cases extend municipal consumer protection challenges to the two prediction-market platforms.
The federal order creates competing directions for Kalshi’s New York operations.
The order requires Kalshi to implement geographic access restrictions in Washington.
The lawsuit challenges the operators’ sports contracts under state gambling rules.
Kalshi must restrict its Washington offering and strengthen geofencing while some financial contracts remain available.
The lawsuits apply Baltimore’s consumer protection enforcement to prediction-market platforms.
The lawsuit seeks penalties over alleged unlicensed wagering and consumer deception.
The suits extend local challenges to the platforms’ sports contracts.
The Kalshi partnership has prompted the loss of a state affiliate.
Kalshi is seeking appellate protection based on the regulator’s emergency action.
Platforms reported more suspected insider traders than the number of people facing reported CFTC action.
The findings apply NCAA betting restrictions to wagers placed through a prediction-market platform.
The cases apply NCAA wagering restrictions to bets placed through a prediction-market platform.
Connecticut can continue applying its gambling laws to Kalshi’s sports contracts.
The federal directive seeks to maintain Kalshi’s operations despite the state’s lawsuit.
The platforms face disclosure requests concerning advertising practices and potential marketing to minors.
The withdrawal ends FlightAware’s reported lawsuit over Kalshi’s use of its data.
The withdrawal ends the filed legal challenge over FlightAware’s role in contract verification.
The order directs continued operation while the New York dispute persists.
The Kalshi relationship is costing NCPG support from a state affiliate.
The disagreement threatens the Nevada council’s affiliation with the national organisation.
The split removes a state affiliate from NCPG’s network over prediction market policy.
The order creates opposing federal and state instructions for Kalshi’s New York operations.
The disagreement ends the Nevada council’s affiliation with the national organisation.
The decision rejects Kalshi’s requested protection from Connecticut’s gambling-law enforcement.
The refusal denies Kalshi the requested temporary protection against state gambling law enforcement.
The decision denies Kalshi the requested protection from Connecticut’s gambling-law enforcement.
The decision leaves the companies without the requested temporary protection against state regulatory action.
The decision leaves Connecticut’s attempt to apply gambling laws unhalted by the requested injunction.
The decisions deny the operators the preliminary protection they sought against state gambling regulation.
The partnership brings a prediction market operator into NCPG’s membership structure.
The agreements connect Genius Sports with two prediction market platforms.
The judgment leaves Kalshi’s sports contracts subject to Utah gambling restrictions.
Genius links its Legend acquisition to customer-acquisition and data opportunities in prediction markets.
The agreements establish Genius Sports relationships with both prediction-market operators.
The ruling allows Utah to pursue state gambling-law enforcement against the platforms.
The agreements extend Genius Sports’ data services into both prediction market exchanges.
The agreements add two prediction-market partners for Genius Sports.
The planned integration will let financial firms monitor employee Kalshi activity alongside other financial-product trades.
The ruling permits Utah gambling-law enforcement while Kalshi prepares an appeal.
The ruling leaves Kalshi subject to Utah gambling-law enforcement.
Utah retains authority to apply its gambling laws to Kalshi.
Utah can continue enforcement despite Kalshi’s federal pre-emption argument.
The judgment allows Utah to apply its gambling laws to Kalshi.
The activity extends prediction market trading into state primary contests.
The judgment subjects Kalshi’s sports contracts to Utah’s gambling prohibition.
Kalshi’s involvement has cost the organisation support from the Michigan regulator.
The proposal would establish state requirements and substantial potential penalties for prediction-market operators.
The ruling permits Utah to enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi.
The request seeks to prevent Iowa gambling-law enforcement against Kalshi’s sports contracts.
The action addresses manipulation of a contract linked to Santos’s own conduct.
The settlement resolves an investigation into an alleged event-contract trade involving Santos’ own attendance.
The lawsuit seeks substantial financial penalties for alleged unlicensed sports betting.
World Cup activity lifted combined trading volume before the subsequent slowdown.
The lawsuit challenges Kalshi’s ability to offer event contracts in New York.
The penalty addresses misleading public statements linked to event contract trading.
The agreement resolves the regulator’s market manipulation investigation.
Kalshi faces a state legal challenge over whether its prediction market complies with gambling law.
The report quantifies notional trading activity across the platforms as sports events drive demand.
The court action seeks substantial damages while leagues press for trading age standards.
The lawsuit adds to the legal uncertainty facing Kalshi’s prediction-market operations.
The lawsuit challenges Kalshi’s authority to operate in New York.
The lawsuit challenges Kalshi’s event-contract operations under New York gambling rules.
The lawsuit challenges Kalshi’s authority to offer event contracts in New York.
The lawsuit seeks damages and an order restricting Kalshi’s operations.
The lawsuit seeks to stop Kalshi’s New York operations and recover money for consumers.
The lawsuit contests Kalshi’s legal authority to offer its products in New York.
The lawsuit challenges Kalshi’s authority to offer event contracts under New York law.
The hearing leaves Kalshi’s disputed access in Ohio and Tennessee unresolved.
The decision leaves New York enforcement unhalted by the emergency injunction Kalshi requested.
The denied injunction leaves New York able to pursue enforcement while Kalshi’s lawsuit continues.
Minnesota cannot implement its prediction-market ban while the preliminary injunction applies.
The injunction limits immediate enforcement while leaving questions over sports contracts unresolved.
The comments raise concerns about prediction markets in a responsible gambling discussion.
The injunction pauses enforcement of the challenged prediction market prohibition.
The decision leaves Kalshi challenging New York’s gambling-law authority on appeal.
The injunction temporarily prevents enforcement of Minnesota’s prediction market prohibition.
The ruling prevents the proposed state restriction from proceeding against prediction-market operators.
The bill would create state oversight while allowing sports event contracts.
A broader range of contracts extends the platforms’ trading activity beyond elections.
The agreement requires Kalshi to end Nevada activity following problems implementing the court order.
Kalshi must implement geofencing to avoid the daily penalty.
The agreement requires Kalshi to restrict Nevada access to its sports contracts.
The geofencing agreement addresses alleged noncompliance with Nevada’s court restrictions.
The agreement imposes a deadline and financial consequences for incomplete Nevada blocking.
Kalshi faces daily penalties if it misses the agreed Nevada withdrawal deadline.
The bill offers a state regulatory route for prediction-market platforms.
The agreement restricts Kalshi’s Nevada offering and creates potential daily financial consequences.
Kalshi faces daily penalties if it misses the agreed deadline to stop Nevada wagering.
The agreement requires Kalshi to strengthen Nevada access restrictions through an external location provider.
The request seeks to extend Kalshi’s protection beyond the state’s temporary enforcement pause.
The proposal would prevent registered exchanges from offering the specified gambling contracts.
The forecasts set out analysts’ expectations for prediction market transaction volumes.
The lawsuit seeks protection for OG against prospective Washington enforcement.
The hub expands Kalshi’s election information offering beyond trade execution.
The preliminary injunction constrains Kalshi while the Washington case continues.
The report presents competing assessments of prediction markets’ impact on Flutter’s sportsbook activity.
The warning links election contract trading to potential voting restrictions and criminal charges.
The preliminary injunction limits Kalshi’s sports event-contract activity in Washington.
The restrictions limit Irish users’ access following the regulator’s warning of court action.
The tournament brought additional users and trading volume to the prediction platforms.
The ruling supports state enforcement while the court determines the injunction’s detailed restrictions.
The preliminary ruling allows Washington’s gambling-law case against Kalshi to advance.
The new category extends Kalshi’s event contracts into pharmaceutical research outcomes.
The reported share points to prediction markets competing with sportsbooks for World Cup activity.
The company attributes a substantial increase in users and trading to World Cup activity.
The proposed measure would require new age-verification technology for sportsbooks and prediction markets.
The products extend Kalshi’s event contracts into biotechnology and medicine regulation.
The allegations concern potential access to advance information in speech-based prediction contracts.
Conflicting state and federal directions leave Kalshi facing competing obligations in Michigan.
The investigation examines alleged misuse of non-public information in speech-related event contracts.
The investigation concerns a presidential aide’s trading on speech-related contracts.
Kalshi adds an executive with experience at Underdog.
The proposal would add facial age verification requirements for sportsbooks and prediction market platforms.
The coordinated action concerns access to prediction market platforms.
Both companies face disciplinary proceedings over alleged unlicensed gambling activity in Spain.
The two prediction market platforms face a temporary block and regulatory investigation.
Relationships extracted from our entries: partners, suppliers, investors, licensing and markets.
Dillon Borgida
ARK Invest, DICE ETF
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Ireland, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina
Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town, Alturas Indian Rancheria, Atlanta Braves, Boston Red Sox, Catalist Sports, Comply, Genius Sports, Greenville Rancheria, HNS, IC360, Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation, Los Angeles Dodgers
Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town, Alturas Indian Rancheria, Greenville Rancheria, Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation
Key developments by month.
Select a connection to read its reporting, then follow the next entity.