Amici urge Supreme Court to review New Jersey’s dispute with Kalshi
The dispute concerns whether states can apply gambling rules to sports-event contracts offered by federally regulated exchanges.
Decisions and developments involving CFTC. Open in the feed
Add it to your personal digest. Manage your digest
Regulatory decisions and related reporting.
Reported licences, deals, appointments and other connections. Follow the entry links for context.
Newest first, grouped by month.
The dispute concerns whether states can apply gambling rules to sports-event contracts offered by federally regulated exchanges.
The outcome could determine whether prediction market operators can continue serving the US market under federal or state rules.
Kalshi’s proposed rule would allow financial penalties, suspension or account deactivation for users harassing athletes or third parties over trading.
The CFTC proposal would classify sports, political, cultural and weather event contracts as swaps and explicitly include them in rules.
CFTC approval would allow Blockchain.com to offer futures, options and prediction market contracts to retail and institutional customers.
The applications could enable Blockchain.com to seek approval to bring prediction markets and regulated trading to US users.
Kalshi retains preliminary protection from Illinois gambling enforcement, while wager-related fees remain subject to further briefing.
Ohio’s request puts disputed state and federal authority over sports prediction market operators before the Supreme Court.
The lobbying seeks to influence the regulatory treatment of prediction market products in the USA.
The exclusion clarifies which gambling products fall outside CFTC oversight for state-licensed and tribal operators.
The measures could affect how operators and prediction-market exchanges are regulated at federal and state level.
Operators could face separate state disputes over sports event contracts if Supreme Court review leaves conflicting appeals decisions unresolved.
The exclusion clarifies which licensed gambling products fall outside CFTC oversight while preserving separate treatment for exchange-traded prediction contracts.
The rule concerns the regulatory distinction between sports event contracts and traditional sports betting.
The case and lawsuit could affect how sports event contracts operate and how Florida’s gaming compact applies to DraftKings’ platform.
The dispute could determine whether sports prediction market operators must comply with state gambling laws or federal oversight.
The dispute concerns whether sports prediction platforms must comply with state gambling laws alongside federal financial supervision.
The case could determine whether states can apply gambling laws to prediction market operators such as Kalshi and Polymarket.
Oversight of prediction markets remains contested between the CFTC and state gaming regulators as sports event contracts expand.
The appointment expands Dechert’s capacity to advise clients on prediction markets and CFTC regulation.
The injunctions give Kalshi and the CFTC interim judicial relief against Illinois.
Polymarket and Kalshi face unresolved oversight questions as experts warn stock-linked contracts could affect share trading and complicate enforcement.
Prediction market operators face proposed rules intended to secure CFTC authority over their sector.
Investors face contrasting casino transaction outcomes as an MGM takeover collapsed while the Caesars deal progressed.
Prediction market exchanges face a CFTC warning about manipulation risks involving public figures’ statements or actions.
The Indian Gaming Association seeks explicit safeguards against federal commodities law overriding state and tribal gaming laws.
The lobbying effort seeks restrictions on prediction markets within legislation that would expand the CFTC’s regulatory authority.
For prediction market operators, federal intervention challenges Connecticut’s enforcement measures, while Robinhood seeks to join the proceedings.
Operators face unresolved gaming definitions as the CFTC deliberates and Nevada and New Jersey assert authority over sports-outcome contracts.
The ruling leaves Kalshi exposed to Utah gambling enforcement while its appeal continues.
The partnership assigns OG.com infrastructure and clearing responsibilities for Robinhood’s retail event contracts through its CFTC-regulated exchange and clearinghouse.
The bill seeks to remove Illinois’s prediction market tax, whose application Kalshi and the CFTC challenged in court.
The Illinois repeal proposal would remove the sports prediction market transaction tax challenged by Kalshi and the CFTC.
The case could determine whether operators offering sports event contracts must comply with state gambling licensing and tax requirements.
The petition challenges a ruling that prevents New Jersey gaming authorities from blocking Kalshi’s sports contracts.
New York’s attorney general’s office challenges the CFTC’s emergency order as promoting Kalshi’s interests in nationwide litigation.
New Jersey seeks clarity on whether federal event contract oversight blocks state gambling enforcement.
The CFTC sanction combines a fine, profit surrender and a three-year trading ban for betting on presidential speech content.
The settlement requires Perez to surrender trading gains and bars him from trading for three years over alleged misuse of confidential government information.
The criticism puts the CFTC’s response to court orders under scrutiny from gaming attorneys.
The CFTC’s instruction leaves Kalshi facing conflicting agency and court directions over continued trading in New York.
Tribes argue federal oversight of sports contracts would divert tribal gaming revenue and conflict with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
Potentially conflicting appeals rulings could bring the CFTC-state dispute over event contract oversight before the Supreme Court, according to Pidot.
The committee examined manipulation risks, while disputed examples highlight disagreement over which products breached standards.
The proposed arrangement gives Gemini Titan exclusivity for regulated crypto event contracts distributed through Apex’s futures commission merchant.
The CFTC committee hearing contributes to developing the agency’s prediction market roadmap amid tense exchanges.
Selig proposed prediction market rules while defending federal oversight against challenges concerning legality and self-certification limits.
Sportsbook and prediction market executives have representation on the CFTC committee discussing prediction markets.
Operators seeking relief from state enforcement face federal appeals proceedings as the CFTC moves towards new sector rules.
Operators face competing federal and state jurisdiction claims, alongside New York’s allegations against Kalshi over gambling and tax avoidance.
The regulatory roadmap puts manipulation risks, consumer safeguards and event contract self-certification under industry scrutiny.
State regulators argue sports contracts require gambling licences, challenging platforms operating under CFTC oversight with substantial sports trading activity.
Federal backing for permitted operators and insufficient congressional support underpin a lawyer’s assessment that states would gain no midterm advantage.
The dispute concerns whether state and tribal gambling laws apply to prediction markets offering sports event contracts.
The planned White House meeting connects prediction market executives with President Trump and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman.
Connecticut can enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi following the rejection of emergency relief pending appeal.
Court pressure on the CFTC and approaching geofencing deadlines give gambling industry investors regulatory developments to monitor.
Kalshi remains without its requested emergency injunction during appeal after the judge rejected reliance on the CFTC order.
The federal order creates competing directions for Kalshi’s New York operations.
The filed rules would add a uniform minimum age and further trading protections at Ludlow Exchange.
The framework brings responsible-trading requirements into Novig’s exchange operations.
Kalshi is seeking appellate protection based on the regulator’s emergency action.
Platforms reported more suspected insider traders than the number of people facing reported CFTC action.
The federal directive seeks to maintain Kalshi’s operations despite the state’s lawsuit.
The request concerns a contract category the report says is absent from current markets.
The order directs continued operation while the New York dispute persists.
The order creates opposing federal and state instructions for Kalshi’s New York operations.
The filings extend DraftKings’ proposed prediction-trading products to football markets and multi-leg combinations.
The launch adds a federally regulated sports event-contract exchange to the US market.
Selig’s statement opposes state-level rules for prediction-market operators.
The launch introduces a federally overseen sports prediction platform restricted to adults aged 21 and above.
The designation enables Novig’s nationwide event-contract offering.
The rollout expands access to Novig’s regulated sports prediction contracts.
The senators seek to prevent wildfire-linked contracts from entering prediction markets.
The launch expands access to Novig’s federally regulated sports event contracts.
The request seeks to prevent Iowa gambling-law enforcement against Kalshi’s sports contracts.
The action addresses manipulation of a contract linked to Santos’s own conduct.
The settlement resolves an investigation into an alleged event-contract trade involving Santos’ own attendance.
The order restricts Santos’s trading following the regulator’s market-manipulation finding.
The penalty addresses misleading public statements linked to event contract trading.
The agreement resolves the regulator’s market manipulation investigation.
The filing contests federal control over the sports prediction contracts at issue.
The court action seeks substantial damages while leagues press for trading age standards.
The settlement imposes a financial consequence without an admission of wrongdoing.
The coalition contests the federal legal basis for regulating sports prediction contracts.
The planned application would seek regulatory permission for Binance.US prediction markets.
The objections challenge the CFTC’s proposed oversight of sports contracts.
The application keeps a potential prediction market option available without committing to a launch.
The application preserves an exchange option without committing RSI to an immediate sports-contract launch.
The decision leaves Wisconsin able to pursue its gambling enforcement.
The refusal leaves Wisconsin’s enforcement efforts unhalted by the requested injunction.
Wisconsin’s enforcement efforts continue without the preliminary restriction sought by the CFTC.
Minnesota cannot implement its prediction-market ban while the preliminary injunction applies.
The request seeks tighter limits on contracts linked to sporting events.
The letter adds basketball’s objections to the federal prediction-market rulemaking process.
The league is seeking additional integrity protections in the CFTC’s proposed framework.
The responses present competing demands for the proposed federal prediction-market framework.
The letter contests the CFTC’s proposed authority over sports prediction markets.
The injunction temporarily prevents enforcement of Minnesota’s prediction market prohibition.
The ruling prevents the proposed state restriction from proceeding against prediction-market operators.
The NFL’s requests would impose additional limits and safeguards on sports prediction contracts.
The NFL’s request seeks additional integrity protections for prediction-market contracts.
The advisory cautions operators against broad use of event-contract self-certification.
The advisory directs attention to compliance with contract self-certification requirements.
Apex’s infrastructure supports tastytrade’s new prediction contract offering.
The filings seek approval for a wider sports prediction market offering.
The lawsuit challenges Washington’s proposed application of gambling enforcement to OG.
The allegations concern potential access to advance information in speech-based prediction contracts.
Conflicting state and federal directions leave Kalshi facing competing obligations in Michigan.
The investigation examines alleged misuse of non-public information in speech-related event contracts.
The investigation concerns a presidential aide’s trading on speech-related contracts.
Select a connection to read its reporting, then follow the next entity.