Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court questions Kalshi sports contracts
Judges on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court questioned whether Kalshi’s sports-related contracts differ from conventional sports betting during an appeal hearing. Kalshi argues that federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversight precludes state intervention; Massachusetts officials say the company needs state sports betting licences. The court’s decision remains pending, and an earlier order blocking the contracts is on hold during the appeal.
The ruling could determine whether Massachusetts can apply its sports betting laws to Kalshi’s sports contracts.