ANJL-commissioned Nexus poll finds bets ban will not sway 77% of voters
The poll suggests the betting ban carries little weight with voters, weakening the electoral case for the prohibition ahead of the run-off.
Search reports and explore the latest developments.
The poll suggests the betting ban carries little weight with voters, weakening the electoral case for the prohibition ahead of the run-off.
The poll shows about one in five former bettors moved to illegal sites, informing channelisation and enforcement decisions.
Poll shows only about 1% of electorate changed candidate because of the ban, informing operators' political risk.
The opinion could shape the STF's ruling on whether the federal betting ban moots state advertising challenges.
The case tests whether states can restrict betting advertising on public property while federal rules on the sector remain under challenge at the STF.
The figures suggest bettors may shift to unauthorised platforms, a compliance and market-integrity concern for licensed operators.
Operators and suppliers face regulatory uncertainty in Brazil while industry bodies campaign against a proposed betting prohibition.
The ruling will determine whether licensed operators can resume online betting and advertising in Brazil or remain suspended.
Operators and suppliers in Brazil face uncertainty over betting rules as industry bodies and clubs mobilise against the prohibition.
The manifesto shows licensed operators publicly opposing a ban they say pushes players toward illegal sites.
The campaign brings industry bodies and football clubs into opposition to the betting prohibition.
The growth in illegal sites increases exposure to betting platforms for children and adolescents in Brazil, according to the ANJL president.
The research addresses how Brazil’s betting rules and the challenge to the federal measure could affect operators and the regulated market.
Monitoring identified 41,716 suspicious gambling websites targeting Brazil following the reported betting ban, documenting the scale for regulators.
Ganime’s assessment points to concerns over how the prohibition affects operators’ existing contracts with football clubs and broadcasters.
Operators and suppliers face workforce cuts and furloughs as the ban's legality awaits a Supreme Federal Court ruling on the ANJL challenge.
ANJL and IBJR are seeking Supreme Court intervention to suspend Brazil’s betting ban.
ANJL seeks to preserve betting authorisations while Congress decides on the provisional measure.
The requests could delay a court decision on challenges affecting betting companies operating in Brazil.
The criticism concerns blocking measures affecting betting operators’ websites and social media channels in Brazil.
The disputed measures require regulated operators to redirect their websites using their own infrastructure, raising questions over costs, implementation and personal data protection.
The associations seek court intervention to stop betting-site visitors being redirected to the “Brasil sem Bets” page.
Operators warn the ban could redirect bettors to illegal operators and disrupt sports sponsorships and investment planning.
The conflicting descriptions concern the associations’ stance on whether Brazil’s betting market should continue.
ANJL's central bank data analysis challenges a direct link between Brazil's betting prohibition and fewer Pix transactions.