Pennsylvania Supreme Court hears arguments on skill-game legality
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard arguments last week on whether skill-game machines qualify as illegal gambling devices. State lawyers argued the skill component is optional and difficult, while Pace-O-Matic’s representatives disputed that the machines meet the statutory definition of a slot machine. The court’s decision could clarify the machines’ status under state law.
The court’s decision could clarify whether skill-game machines fall under Pennsylvania’s gambling laws.