Italy’s Court of Cassation upholds gaming operator’s embezzlement conviction
The ruling confirms criminal liability for a gaming operator’s failure to remit sums treated by the court as public funds.
The ruling confirms criminal liability for a gaming operator’s failure to remit sums treated by the court as public funds.
The ruling confirms criminal liability may apply to gaming-machine managers who fail to pass on levy-related receipts.
The ruling underlines that gaming companies disputing tax collection must identify evidence of when a payment notice was served.
The ruling confirms that betting centres need the specified public-security authorisation even when gaming machines hold other permits.
The ruling reinforces the authorisation requirement for businesses collecting bets directly in Italy.
The ruling maintains vehicle retention and approves transfer to the Supreme Court in an alleged illegal betting and laundering case.
For private club operators, the rejected appeal makes a six-month prison sentence for gambling law breaches final.
Nearly 70 rulings support ADM’s position on the tax base used to calculate unauthorised bookmakers’ single betting tax.
The ruling supports margin-based tax calculations for betting operators whose activity is documented outside the national totalisator.
The ruling leaves confiscated betting-related business assets in state hands and affirms the scope of forfeiture in this case.
The ruling may affect how operators and suppliers of non-prize arcade machines are regulated in Italy.
The ruling leaves the conviction’s consequences in place despite the court’s criticism of the notification delay.
The ruling clarifies when venue property under active supervision can qualify for an aggravated-damage charge.
The ruling upholds a conviction based on organised betting collection despite the small value of the recorded wager.
The ruling may affect how betting businesses can use accounting records in tax appeals.
The ruling confirms criminal exposure for gambling involving prizes where chance, rather than skill, determines outcomes.
The remand leaves the seizure measures and related allegations subject to further judicial review.
The remand leaves the application of the mafia-related aggravating factor to be reassessed in the betting case.
The ruling affects the tax exposure of betting shops serving foreign bookmakers and leaves the 2015 calculation to be reconsidered.
The ruling requires recalculation of higher-method assessments for 2015, affecting outstanding tax claims without cancelling them automatically.
The ruling confirms criminal liability for an organised illegal lottery operation and its established mafia link.
Gaming-machine businesses can argue for standard VAT treatment based on their accounting and tax conduct.