ANJL and IBJR ask Supreme Federal Court to suspend Brazil betting ban
The trade bodies argue that the ban threatens operators’ existing authorisations after they invested in Brazil’s regulated market.
Business and regulatory reporting on Anseja.
Business and regulatory reporting. Dates show when reports were published; they do not establish when a change took effect or whether a relationship continues.
ANJL and IBJR have asked Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court to suspend Provisional Measure 1,394, which prohibited betting site operations. The trade bodies argue that the measure lacks constitutionally required urgency and threatens existing authorisations. They alternatively seek an extension of at least six months to the measure’s deadlines.
Also in this report: ANJL · IBJR · Brazil · Supreme Federal Court
Request a correction / right of reply
Co-mentions in the same reports. These do not establish a business relationship. Countries identify the subject of reporting, not where a company operates.
Newest first, grouped by month.
The trade bodies argue that the ban threatens operators’ existing authorisations after they invested in Brazil’s regulated market.
Select a connection to read its reporting, then follow the next entity.